White-Label Evidence Brief Pilot
White-label evidence briefs that pass visual QA before delivery.
Turn messy client claims, controls, source paths, and evidence references into polished, traceable, client-ready brief packages your consultancy can deliver under its own brand.
Built for compliance, AI governance, GovCon, and technical advisory consultants who already sell evidence-heavy client work.
Problem
Your advisory work is valuable. The packaging still eats the margin.
Client evidence rarely arrives clean. Controls live in one file, source paths in another, claims in meeting notes, screenshots in folders, and final comments in email threads.
That last mile is where briefs break: tables overflow, hashes become unreadable, evidence references lose context, and the PDF technically renders but still fails human review.
QA pattern
Visual QA catches brief failures automated rendering can miss.
This public page does not publish private screenshots or per-artifact receipt names. The public-safe claim is the workflow: evidence references are checked for overflow and readability, failures are corrected before handoff, and the aggregate QA summary reports the final public status.
Render success is not enough
Evidence-heavy briefs can generate a PDF while still failing consultant review because references overflow, lose context, or scan poorly.
- Source references are checked for readable boundaries.
- Claim context is reviewed before handoff.
- Layout failures block delivery until corrected.
Readable evidence packaging
The pilot uses bounded evidence sections, source attribution, and a final visual QA summary instead of publishing private client artifacts.
- Each claim is mapped to a contained evidence reference.
- Review order follows the claim boundary.
- Public summaries stay aggregate; private receipts stay in handoff.
What you get
One finished evidence brief package, ready for consultant review.
- Consultant-branded cover and footer language
- Structured claim or control mapping
- Source path and evidence-reference traceability
- Rendered PDF brief
- Visual QA receipt for the final output
- Reproducibility receipt with hashes and artifact references
- 10 to 15 minute Loom walkthrough
- 30-minute debrief call
- One formatting or mapping correction pass
- 14-day clarification window
Cost context
Per-claim and per-evidence-reference economics, anchored against your billable hour.
The pilot does not compete with a freelance designer. It absorbs the upstream packaging hours your senior consultants would otherwise spend mapping claims, attributing source paths, and gating render quality before client review.
Per claim or control
~$117
$3,500 ÷ 30 claims, mapped and traceable to source path.
Per evidence reference
~$70
$3,500 ÷ 50 references, attributed and indexed.
Per source document
~$350
$3,500 ÷ 10 documents, files, or links absorbed at intake.
Senior-consultant hours absorbed
~10–15 hrs
The packaging hour-budget the pilot is designed to free.
Offer
White-Label Evidence Brief Pilot
One white-label evidence brief package for one real client deliverable. The pilot is successful when your consultancy can send the brief with minimal edits, every claim is traceable to evidence, and the final PDF passes visual QA before delivery.
Downside surfaced
Bounded refund, narrow caps, named limits.
Two readers usually validate this kind of pilot. The principal validates scope and voice. The CFO or finance partner validates per-unit economics, downside, and exit clauses. Both surfaces are stated below.
- Refund clause
- If CDS misses the 5-business-day window after complete intake, the pilot is refundable on request. No roll-forward, no obligation to continue.
- What does not fit
- Pilot caps are 30 claims or controls, 50 evidence references, 10 source documents. Beyond those caps, scoping moves to a different package — the pilot price holds only for work inside these caps.
- What we do not provide
- No legal opinion, no compliance certification, no security attestation, no government approval, no classified-data handling, no audit guarantee. The pilot is brief production, not authority issuance.
- Break-even framing
- A consultant who runs 4 evidence-heavy briefs per quarter at 12 senior-consultant hours per brief recovers the pilot at brief 1 if those hours bill elsewhere at $300+/hour. At $250/hour, break-even is brief 2. Below that, the math depends on whether freed hours convert to billable work — call it explicitly before renewing.
Reader paths
Two readers, two validations.
Scope validator — the consultant principal — uses the good-fit list to decide whether the pilot lands inside the engagement and whether the surface voice matches their firm. ROI validator — the consultant's finance partner or solo-CFO mode — reads the cost-context grid, the downside section, and the not-a-fit list to decide whether the per-unit math survives review.
Good fit
Built for consultants who already own the client relationship.
- AI governance consultants
- SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, and GRC advisors
- Fractional CISO and compliance readiness firms
- CMMC and NIST 800-171 consultants
- GovCon and SBIR proposal advisors
- Technical due diligence and research advisory firms
Not a fit
Narrow scope keeps the pilot clean.
- Legal opinions
- Compliance certifications
- Security attestations
- Classified-data workflows
- Generic AI content generation
- Unlimited custom report design
Process
Five business days after complete intake.
01
Intake
You send the source packet, claim/control list, evidence references, and branding notes.
02
Normalize
We map the claims, attribute source paths, and index evidence references.
03
Render
We render the white-label evidence brief under your branding.
04
QA
We run visual QA on the rendered PDF and correct any layout failures the gate flags.
05
Hand-off
You receive the PDF, the visual-QA receipt, the reproducibility receipt, the Loom walkthrough, and the debrief.
Next step
Test it on one real deliverable.
Bring one client deliverable that is painful to package. We will confirm fit, scope, timeline, and whether the source material is ready.